Month: December 2009

<<<So all my married female friends are pretending they have good relationships with their husbands and that their minds are not screwed up? How screwy is that kind of reasoning?>>>

What Judy not so subtly champions is extra-marital sex, which God calls whoredom.

That makes Judy a whore.

Isn’t that right, Viva?

John Knight

From: Viva Veridad

Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 7:42 AM

To: judyfuller007 ; virginiaf.raines

Cc: jimmybug ; algae5636 ; debunks ; viva ; carpbear ; tdietlin ; jk ; majorhart ; blackexilenow ; nikon99 ; isaiah14 ; edpals2 ; jmach499 ; harleymanfl ; ANTGNE ; cactuscougar ; ELLIAJT ; Hillbillytrailer ; jgtea ; JBoyle10 ; konola ; Lilbigy659 ; Marckie13 ; Rockysma1 ; Sirguy2003 ; whatnowgop

Subject: Re: a necessary evil

So all my married female friends are pretending they have good relationships with their husbands and that their minds are not screwed up?

How screwy is that kind of reasoning?

Hey, you filthy sodomite kike, why don’t you do the world a favor and die of [email protected]!?

Or, better yet, before you die the horrible AIDS DEATH, define “whore” for us, ok?

Here are some pointers for you:

God has a particular problem with Israelites who "go a whoring" after the daughters of Molech, Ahab, Arabia, Egyptians, Assyrians, Moab, and gillul:

Lev 20:5 Then I will set my face against that man, and against his family, and will cut him off, and all that go a whoring after him, to commit whoredom with Molech, from among their people.

Num 25:1 And Israel abode in Shittim, and the people began to commit whoredom with the daughters of Moab.

2Ch 21:13 But hast walked in the way of the kings of Israel, and hast made Judah and the inhabitants of Jerusalem to go a whoring, like to the whoredoms of the house of Ahab, and also hast slain thy brethren of thy father’s house, [which were] better than thyself:

Jer 3:2 Lift up thine eyes unto the high places, and see where thou hast not been lain with. In the ways hast thou sat for them, as the Arabian in the wilderness; and thou hast polluted the land with thy whoredoms and with thy wickedness.

Eze 16:26 Thou hast also committed fornication with the Egyptians thy neighbours, great of flesh; and hast increased thy whoredoms, to provoke me to anger.

Eze 16:28 Thou hast played the whore also with the Assyrians, because thou wast unsatiable; yea, thou hast played the harlot with them, and yet couldest not be satisfied.

Eze 20:29-31 Then I said unto them, What [is] the high place whereunto ye go? And the name thereof is called Bamah unto this day. Wherefore say unto the house of Israel, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Are ye polluted after the manner of your fathers? and commit ye whoredom after their abominations? For when ye offer your gifts, when ye make your sons to pass through the fire, ye pollute yourselves with all your idols [read: gillul], even unto this day: and shall I be enquired of by you, O house of Israel? [As] I live, saith the Lord GOD, I will not be enquired of by you.

If you don’t like GOD’S definition, then what is YOUR definition?

John Knight

From: Mark [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 8:07 PM
To: Judy Hayner
Cc: Jacob Israel; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: a necessary evil

I think black-eyed peas are one of the most disgusting vegetables on the planet.

However, I think people should have the right to choose whether or not to eat black-eyed peas.

Therefore, I eat blackeyed peas every day.

That makes absolutely NO sense.

Neither does John Knight’s statement:

What Judy not so subtly champions is extra-marital sex, which God calls whoredom.

That makes Judy a whore.

You are one truly STUPID Nazi, John.

Mark

carpbear

^-^

{ o o }

_~_/

On Dec 30, 2009, at 9:48 PM, Judy Hayner <edpals2> wrote:

LOL!

You are such an old creeper, JKnight!

Only YOU could find "whoredom" and illicit sex in a scenario where these poor women barely have the courage to have sex with their own HUSBANDS!

You can have your little fantasies, just keep your insults to yourself.

<<< The word "achariyth" is used idiomatically for FUTURE. Its use in many other passages demonstrates that.>>>

Correct. And even Paul quoted that verse so that “last days” applied to HIS time, while HE was alive, as “THESE last days”:

Heb 1:1 God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets,

Heb 1:2 Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds;

Heb 1:3 Who being the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his power, when he had by himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high;

So even IF “last days” has some mysterious meaning about the end of time, those days ended about the time Jesus’s Twelve Disciples or Paul died.

Sincerely,

John Knight

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 5:29 PM
To: Russell Walker
Cc: ‘Jacob Israel’; [email protected]; ‘Judy Nipps’; ‘Eli’; [email protected]; [email protected]; ‘Byron Gaar’; ‘Buddy’; ‘Athena’
Subject: Re: Shiloh done came and went

Well, that is the common English transliteration of the Hebrew word translated "last" in the passage you cite – which proves again that you spout off about that which you do not know.

Russell Walker wrote:

Bill – I have absolutely no idea what “achariyhth” is or where it comes from and I seriously doubt if anyone else does either. russ

<<<So all my married female friends are pretending they have good relationships with their husbands and that their minds are not screwed up? How screwy is that kind of reasoning?>>>

What Judy not so subtly champions is extra-marital sex, which God calls whoredom.

That makes Judy a whore.

Isn’t that right, Viva?

John Knight

From: Viva Veridad

Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 7:42 AM

To: judyfuller007 ; virginiaf.raines

Cc: jimmybug ; algae5636 ; debunks ; viva ; carpbear ; tdietlin ; jk ; majorhart ; blackexilenow ; nikon99 ; isaiah14 ; edpals2 ; jmach499 ; harleymanfl ; ANTGNE ; cactuscougar ; ELLIAJT ; Hillbillytrailer ; jgtea ; JBoyle10 ; konola ; Lilbigy659 ; Marckie13 ; Rockysma1 ; Sirguy2003 ; whatnowgop

Subject: Re: a necessary evil

So all my married female friends are pretending they have good relationships with their husbands and that their minds are not screwed up?

How screwy is that kind of reasoning?

<<< True. You must remember that God created the white race (Adam, literally means white man blood in the face red, or ruddy, to blush red). There is evidence that Adam, or Adamites were the only one’s that have the spirit of God in them. Than from Adam cam the Hebrews (or man from the other side. Hebrew is taken from Abraham’s grandfather "Eber," some think that Hebrew actually means sons or daughters of Eber, or the Eber clan), and then Israel from Isaac. Jacob was the first Israelite simply because God changed his name. For some reason most theologians forget this whole scenario. They might forget on purpose. >>>

You raise an interesting question about exactly what this name change, from Jacob to Israel, was all about.

Since it was God who did it, we need to look at it a bit more closely:

Gen 32:28 And he said, Thy name shall be called no more Jacob, but Israel: for as a prince hast thou power with God and with men, and hast prevailed.

H3478

ישׂראל

yiśrâ’êl

yis-raw-ale’

From H8280 and H410; he will rule as God; Jisrael, a symbolical name of Jacob; also (typically) of his posterity: – Israel.

As usual, these jew controlled references are a so limited in such key definitions that it ought to be a crime for them to even exist. This has almost nothing to do with what “Is Ra El” means, and in fact is seriously misleading. This is not merely a “symbolical name”, it’s got a heavy meaning.

It’s BLASPHEMY of the Name of the LORD to claim that Jacob would ever “rule AS God”. Even “rule WITH God” is on the hairy edge of Blasphemy.

The “ra” in “Is RA el” is the same “ra” as in “To RA”. And “ra” means “God” in many languages, including Korean, Latvian, and Egyptian (though it’s ALLEGEDLY the Egyptian sun god).

It does not mean that Jacob will “rule as God”, it means that he IS of God, and thus IS of God’s Law, the To RA! And that only means that his rule will be in accord with the To RA, or God’s Law (which of course existed before Jacob was born, otherwise how could his grandfather Abraham have obeyed God?):

Because that Abraham obeyed my voice, and kept my charge, my commandments, my statutes, and my laws. Genesis 26:5

And that gets us back to Ireland, to the “Hill of To RA”, which is most likely where both Abraham and Jacob were FROM, which is why God changed his name.

);

Sincerely,

John Knight

From: Terry Gabrich [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 8:57 AM
To: Jacob Israel
Subject: Re: Gen 49:10

Original Message

From: Jacob Israel

To: Jacob Israel ; <a href=”mailto:eduardo-1

Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2009 10:54 PM

Subject: Re: Merry Christmas ONLY to our WHITE Christian Israelite Brethren

Dear Eduardo,

Great to hear from you, and Merry Christmas to you and yours.

You wrote:

<<< The “Back-to-Africa” campaign had a strong voice from Jefferson’s day to the Lincoln’s presidency and beyond. America simply could not muster the monumental expense of carrying it out. >>>

EACH White man must now work 42 days each year JUST to earn enough to pay JUST the taxes which fund JUST the social transfer payments paid JUST to niggers, which is a whopping one trillion dollars annually.

The maximum cost of shipping all 38 million niggers back to Liberia, buying them and acre of land and a mule, is less than $200 billion, so we save $800 billion the first year, and more than a trillion every year after that.

Of course our great white leaders today can’t even discuss it, much less implement it.

What do you believe we should do?

Sincerely,

John Knight

Original Message

From: Eduardo

To: Jacob Israel

Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2009 1:50 PM

Subject: Re: Merry Christmas ONLY to our WHITE Christian Israelite Brethren

“He [King George] has waged cruel war against human nature itself, violating its most sacred right of life and liberty in the persons of a distant people who never offended him, captivating & carrying them into slavery in another hemisphere, or to incur miserable death in their transportation thither”, Thomas Jefferson, deleted portion of a draft of the Declaration of Independence, June, 1776

AND, it was King George who was bought off by the financial jews and their fiat currency. From Roman times and before, jews have ALWAYS been involved in slave trade. Today, 20 thousand Eastern Europeans are sold into slavery EACH year in Israel.

Sooooooooo, do you THINK the landowners in the colonies were sold a rotten bill of goods? Jefferson and others were responsible enough to take care of their “bad investment” until a means was found to set them free. Setting free Congolese slaves was not an easy feat, especially in the American colonies. Neighbors and politics would not stand for “roving” strangers in their lands. Each landowner inherently knew the proper place was to return them to Africa, but couldn’t afford the exorbinant cost in doing so. The “Back-to-Africa” campaign had a strong voice from Jefferson’s day to the Lincoln’s presidency and beyond. America simply could not muster the monumental expense of carrying it out.

-eduardo

Original Message

From: Jacob Israel

To: nora22000

Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2009 8:55 AM

Subject: Merry Christmas ONLY to our WHITE Christian Israelite Brethren

<<<Um, Jefferson was an atheist who rewrote the bible, had multiple children with a black slave, and died insolvent.>>>

um, not bad for an easily beguiled whore. You got exactly one out of four correct, which is better than American 12th grade girls did on TIMSS, a batting average 6 times better than easily beguiled whore raines.

READ what Mr. Jefferson wrote in his own hand, not what a bunch of sodomite edomite kikes pretending to be jews SAID about him, and you might finally have a corner on the truth:

http://fathersmanifesto.net/tj.htm

He DID die insolvent. In fact, he died $200,000 in debt, the equivalent today of $20 million.

Now you know why he wanted to get rid of his nigger slaves who never produced a dime’s worth, eh?

“He [King George] has waged cruel war against human nature itself, violating its most sacred right of life and liberty in the persons of a distant people who never offended him, captivating & carrying them into slavery in another hemisphere, or to incur miserable death in their transportation thither”, Thomas Jefferson, deleted portion of a draft of the Declaration of Independence, June, 1776

John Knight

From: nora22000

Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2009 1:07 PM

To: Jacob Israel

Subject: Re: Merry Christmas ONLY to our WHITE Christian Israelite Brethren

Um, Jefferson was an atheist who rewrote the bible, had multiple children with a black slave, and died insolvent. — On Wed, 12/23/09, Jacob Israel <jk> wrote: From: Jacob Israel <jk> Subject: Merry Christmas ONLY to our WHITE Christian Israelite Brethren To: cp Date: Wednesday, December 23, 2009, 1:00 PM Merry Christmas ONLY to our WHITE Christian Israelite Brethren Matthew 10:14-15 And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear your words, when ye depart out of that house or city, shake off the dust of your feet. Verily I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom and Gomorrha in the day of judgment, than for that city. When Mr. Jefferson, founder of my alma mater, governor of Virginia, founder of the Democratic Party (and who didn’t even mention on his tombstone that he had once been President of the US), referred to George Washington at his funeral as “a great man (who) hath fallen this day in Israel“, he was not referring to a “nation” called “Israel” (which at the time was still called Palestine). He was referring to something WHITE men knew ever since Jacob was born, Paul visited the British Isles, Jesus commanded His Disciples to go ONLY to Israel, and the Scottish Declaration of Aborath was written, which is that it is ONLY White men who are “ben Israel” or sons of Israel: “I felt on [George Washington’s] death, with my countrymen, that ‘verily a great man hath fallen this day in Israel‘” It’s for their posterity, who are ONLY White men under the Law of God, who are heirs to the US Constitution, just as they are the ONLY heirs to God’s EVERLASTING Covenant: PREAMBLE We, the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect Union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. This cannot change, not even with an amendment. And any amendment which is not in accord with the Preamble is null and void on its face: Galatians 4:30-31 Nevertheless what saith the Scripture? Cast out the bondwoman and her son: for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with the son of the freewoman. So then, brethren, we are not children of the bondwoman, but of the free. Less than one percent of our Founding Fathers were Catholics, NONE of them were jews or Hispanics or Asians, nor were they Blacks. They were WHITE Christian Israelite Unitarians who understood intimately the importance of propagating and protecting His holy seed, who reacted in 1776, two short years after King George had made the Trinity the law of the land, by soundly rejecting Trinitarians. While his detractors claim he was a “deist”, we have this from Mr. Jefferson’s own hand: “A more beautiful or precious morsel of ethics I have never seen; it is a document in proof that I am a real Christian, that is to say, a disciple of the doctrines of Jesus …” “That religion or the duty which we owe to our Creator, and the manner of discharging it, can be directed only by reason and conviction, not by force or violence; and, therefore, all men are equally entitled to the free exercise of religion, according to the dictates of conscience; and that it is the mutual duty of all to practice Christian forbearance, love, and charity towards each other.” Less than two centuries later, the once great sea power England had to turn to its former PROTESTANT colony America to help defend them from the Germans, and this Unitarian land took over their role as the World’s Empire. Act of March 26, 1790 (1 Stat 103-104) “That any alien, being a free white person, who shall have resided within the limits and under the jurisdiction of the United States for the term of two years, may be admitted to become a citizen thereof, on application to any common law court of record, in any one of the States wherein he shall have resided for the term of one year at least, and making proof to the satisfaction of such court, that he is a person of good character…” Today’s’ jews claim that they are included in the above and that our Founding Fathers even consulted with jews in their deliberations. But we have this conclusion about their behavior from Mr. Jefferson’s own hand: JEWS. 1. Their system was Deism; that is, the belief of one only God. But their ideas of him & of his attributes were degrading & injurious. 2. Their Ethics were not only imperfect, but often irreconcilable with the sound dictates of reason & morality, as they respect intercourse with those around us; & repulsive & anti-social, as respecting other nations. They needed reformation, therefore, in an eminent degree. Such people could not have been included as citizens, and in fact jews didn’t even get the vote in some states until years after Blacks got the vote. Scots are of the Twelve Tribes of Israel and are NOT jews: “Most Holy Father and Lord, we know and from the chronicles and books of the ancients we find that among other famous nations our own, the Scots, has been the Tyrrhenian Sea and the Pillars of Hercules, and dwelt for a long course of time in Spain among the most savage tribes, but nowhere could they be subdued by any race, however barbarous. Thence they came, twelve hundred years after the people of Israel crossed the Red Sea, to their home in the west where they still live today.” Throughout the five thousand year history of the White Race, the grandest sin of all has been miscegenation with beasts (as Scripture calls them), animals (as our Founding Fathers called them), Negros (as they are known in Africa), niggers (as they call themselves), Blacks (a politically correct phraseology designed to conceal their real identity), or African Americans (as jews call them). While jews claim that this is racism, less than 0.01% of jews are married to Blacks, giving such a charge the credibility of a 6 year old: “But my neighbors having made good crops, I am not disheartened. The first step towards the recovery of our lands is to find substitutes for corn & bacon. I count on potatoes, clover, & sheep. The two former to feed every animal on the farm except my negroes, & the latter to feed them, diversified with rations of salted fish & molasses, both of them wholesome, agreeable, & cheap articles of food” In his 1781 “Notes on the State of Virginia,” he announced the blacks’ “own judgment in favor of the whites, declared by their preference of them, as uniformly as is the preference of the orangutan for the black woman over those of his own species”. And if a woman approach unto any beast, and lie down thereto, thou shalt kill the woman, and the beast: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them, Leviticus 20:16 The offspring of such an unholy union are accepted by neither race, the act destroys both races, and God commands us to never let them into His congregation: A mamzer shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD; even to his tenth generation shall he not enter into the congregation of the LORD, Deuteronomy 23:2 Thus to the 218 million WHITE Christian Israelite descendants of Jacob who have preserved His holy seed, the ONLY heirs to His EVERLASTING covenant with Jacob in this putative Christian nation, MERRY CHRISTMAS AND HAPPY NEW YEAR!!!

There’s a great heraldry museum in Dublin which shows all the standards and heralds of the 14 Tribes. I have pictures of all of them. If anyone would like them, let me know.

The “lion of Judah” is prevalent, as this was the standard for Judah, just as the serpent was the standard for Dan. I would be that more than half the heralds have the lion of Judah on them.

Lions are not indigenous to Ireland, or the British Isles. WHERE did it come from? The same place David’s Harp came from, which is (was) on all the Irish money?

Just because Jesus was called “the lion of Judah” doesn’t require Him to have been of the House or Tribe of Judah.

The point about “until Shiloh comes” has the necessary corollary which is that AFTER Shiloh comes, then the sceptre necessarily must depart from the lion of Judah.

Shiloh came and went millennia ago, so that prophecy has already been fulfilled.

Jdg 18:31 And they set them up Micah’s graven image, which he made, all the time that the house of God was in Shiloh.

http://fathersmanifesto.net/harp.htm

Sincerely,

John Knight

Original Message
From: Russell Walker
To: caemahiser
Cc: Athena ; <a title="buddy1 ; Byron Gaar ; <a title="columbusm ; semperfidave ; Eli ; <a title="jk ; Judy Nipps ; <a title="wmfinck
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 4:02 PM

Clifton — I am sure that you are well aware of the current controversy about Shiloh, Lion, Lamb, Gen 49, Rev 5:5 etc. You have done a Teaching letter in or about 2002 concerning the Judah/Joseph Scepter controversy. You call it the Joseph Scepter heresy if I remember. I suggest that it would be appropriate for you to review and update this matter especially considering that Gen 49 applies only to the LAST Days. See Gen 49:1. It would be interesting to see your viewpoint of what or who the Scepter is. Remember that only Judah and not the whole House of Israel presently holds the scepter. We are on the verge of the New World Order and I believe that all CI should know exactly who/what the Scepter is and who the Judah of Gen 49:10 is. If you believe that the Shiloh mentioned in Gen 49:10 is the same Shiloh referred to in Rev 5:5, although the phrase Lion of Juda is mentioned, then please tell me why the change? I have done a bible search and can find no where where Yahshuha is characterised as a Lion. He is always characterized as a lamb.

russell walker

<<<So all my married female friends are pretending they have good relationships with their husbands and that their minds are not screwed up? How screwy is that kind of reasoning?>>>

What Judy not so subtly champions is extra-marital sex, which God calls whoredom.

That makes Judy a whore.

Isn’t that right, Viva?

John Knight

From: Viva Veridad
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 7:42 AM
To: judyfuller007 ; virginiaf.raines
Cc: jimmybug ; algae5636 ; debunks ; viva ; carpbear ; tdietlin ; jk ; majorhart ; blackexilenow ; nikon99 ; isaiah14 ; edpals2 ; jmach499 ; harleymanfl ; ANTGNE ; cactuscougar ; ELLIAJT ; Hillbillytrailer ; jgtea ; JBoyle10 ; konola ; Lilbigy659 ; Marckie13 ; Rockysma1 ; Sirguy2003 ; whatnowgop
Subject: Re: a necessary evil

So all my married female friends are pretending they have good relationships with their husbands and that their minds are not screwed up?

How screwy is that kind of reasoning?

<<< His latest wild eyed statement was about how much better a relationship a gay man can have with women because he doesn’t want to put her sperm in her. First that is untrue and second – I don’t know any women that want anything to do with a gay man or lesbian. >>>

What’s even funnier is that there are “women” on this very forum who appear to actually agree that women prefer such faggots because they’re not a “threat”, AND that he’s a “real man”.

How much lower can you go?

I don’t know any such women either, John. And I’m SURE glad I don’t—it’s probably because, just like you, I don’t associate with niggers and kikes and latrinos and other muds, cruds, and mamzers:

http://fathersmanifesto.net/mamzer.htm

Sincerely,

John Knight

From: John Hansen [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 2:57 PM
To: Mark; [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: CRYING & BAWLING……………..

I’m getting the impression that mark really things we are hurt when he blocks us.

His latest wild eyed statement was about how much better a relationship a gay man can have with women because he doesn’t want to put her sperm in her.

First that is untrue and second – I don’t know any women that want anything to do with a gay man or lesbian. Oh I forgot – all the women I know are nazi’s or kkk’ers.

Shucks.

John Hansen

Original Message

From: Mark

To: [email protected]

Cc: [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected]

Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 12:05 PM

Subject: Re: CRYING & BAWLING……………..

Jimmy:

When you can write something which demonstrates you know what you’re talking about, I’d be happy to unblock you.

In the meantime, go stuff your underwear in your mouth.

Mark

[email protected]

^-^

{ o o }

_~_/

On Dec 21, 2009, at 10:45 AM, [email protected] wrote:

How about Joan of Arc, you eejit.

In a message dated 12/21/2009 10:47:40 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, [email protected] writes:

Not at all; nature has made men compared to women strong & emotionally strong so they do not burst out crying if their make-up is not right or they look too fat in the mirror (Which they are but will not admit). Women are emotionally created weaker so they cry very easily, cannot control their emotions and warriors do not cry. Women bawl at the least irrelevant thing. So do GAYS because they pretend to e feminine………………..

— On Sun, 12/20/09, Judy Hayner wrote:

From: Judy Hayner
Subject: Re: JAMES THE BROTHER OF JESUS
To: “John Hansen” , “Jimmy Jumshade” , “Jude” , “Jacob Israel” , [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], “Therese Dietliin”

Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], “Jude” Date: Sunday, December 20, 2009, 10:12 PM

This is true. I don’t know if it just because men learn early that crying isn’t cool, or if you really just don’t have that need as often as women.

One thing that I doubt men get, is that some women, at least those I have discussed this with, cry quite easily. It is almost like a

cleaning out of old stuff.. Sometimes we cry during hallmark commercials, especially at Christmas! We’re often sentimental.

It is not often, but women can cry for what seems like absolutely no reason. I’ve done it. It is like things must build up, it erupts

in tears. May have to do with hormonal fluctuations, or something else. I’m sure men think it is them, but honestly, sometimes it

just has no good reason. But this may not be even most women. I really don’t know.

So, heads up. SOME women can cry easily, but usually that just makes us actually feel BETTER when we’re done..

So, if you care enough, listen, but don’t freak out. It could be over in minutes.

_____

From: John Hansen
To: Jimmy Jumshade ; Jude ; Jacob Israel ; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Judy Hayner ; Therese Dietliin Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Jude Sent: Sun, December 20, 2009 4:15:46 PM
Subject: Re: JAMES THE BROTHER OF JESUS



I can se a man crying but the circumstances are rare.

We suffer but we tned to keep it inside.

Original Message

From: Jimmy Jumshade To: Jude ; Jacob Israel ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; John Hansen ; Judy Hayner ; Therese Dietliin

Cc: [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected]t ; jm[email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; Jude

Sent: Saturday, December 19, 2009 9:29 PM

Subject: Re: JAMES THE BROTHER OF JESUS

Men usually hit women when they just will not shut the heck up. To shut them up. Women bring it upon themselves…………………

— On Sat, 12/19/09, Therese Dietliin wrote:

From: Therese Dietliin
Subject: Re: JAMES THE BROTHER OF JESUS
To: “Jimmy Jumshade” , “Jude” >, “Jacob Israel” , [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], “John Hansen”
, “Judy Hayner” Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] , [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], “Jude”
Date: Saturday, December 19, 2009, 6:57 PM

When I was very young, I saw Gone With the Wind. My mother couldn’t afford a baby sitter so we always went to the movies with her. And since she didn’t know much about what was going on, she would go every Friday, just to escape her pretty terrible circumstances. Naturally, we would all go with her – the babysitter thing, you know. And there were a lot of us – because she didn’t really know what was going on, you know. Anyway, we went to see Gone With the Wind. I will never forget the impression made on my 8? 10? year old mind of Clark Gable as Rhett Butler crying when his wife has the miscarriage because he hit her and she went flying down the staircase. To me, that is a man. And later, he said when he shot that scene and started crying, that was not part of the script. It just happened. He never felt so emasculated and humiliataed in his life. Yet, that scene probably influenced more people in its authenticity than most others in cinema. A comparable scene is Kevin Costner as Garrison addressing the jury during the summation of the Clay Shaw trial. He talked about nation and constitution and justice and future generations. He started crying in the summation. Later, he said that was not in the script or intended. He got carried away. That’s the kind of carried away we all need. This other is bs, pure and simple. The heart knows and is not fooled and cannot be scripted. I rest my case.

— On Sat, 12/19/09, Judy Hayner wrote:

> From: Judy Hayner
> Subject: Re: JAMES THE BROTHER OF JESUS
> To: “Jimmy Jumshade” , “Jude”
, “Jacob Israel” , [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], “John Hansen”

> Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], “Jude” > Date: Saturday, December 19, 2009, 6:33 PM
> You know, this just says it
> all for me.
>
>
> From:
> Jimmy Jumshade
> Sent:
> Sat, December 19, 2009 3:39:56 PM
> Subject: Re:
> JAMES THE BROTHER OF JESUS
>
> And have you noticed this Hollywood crap of
> “Showing men crying” in literally every
> Movie to please the Femmo-NAZIS & women constantly
> rescuing men??!! Sheer artificial
> nonsense………………………….talking about this
> “Role reversal crap” reminds me of a real live
> Joke:
>
> Some Western folks visited Kuwait & saw a rare couple
> where the woman was walking in the front & the man
> behind (contrary to great Arab culture where the woman walks > behind the man) so, the thrilled Western Reporter asked the > man; “Sir, this is great role reversal!! How did you
> ever do this fantastic revolutionary, role reversal thing, > letting the woman walk in front??!!”………….The
> cool Arab man simply
> said……….”Land-Mines”…………………
>
>
>
> — On Sat, 12/19/09, John Hansen
> wrote:
>
> From: John Hansen
> Subject: Re: JAMES THE BROTHER OF JESUS
> To: “Jimmy Jumshade”
> , “Jude”
> , “‘Jacob
> Israel'” ,
> [email protected], [email protected],
> [email protected], [email protected],
> [email protected], [email protected],
> [email protected], [email protected],
> [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
> [email protected], [email protected],
> [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], > [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
> [email protected], [email protected],
> [email protected], [email protected],
> [email protected], [email protected],
> [email protected], [email protected],
> “‘Jude'”
> Date: Saturday, December 19, 2009, 1:30 PM
>
>
>
>
> I’ve noticed some of
> that – especially on the
> lifetime movie channel which both my wife and I see – all
> bad guys are white men
> – some bad guys are white women but the police and judges
> are always
> black.
>
> There is an agenda on tv to discredit nd ridicule the white > man.
>
> However not all women are
> involved in this or agree to it.
>
> John Hansen
>
>
> Original Message
> From:
>
> Jimmy
> Jumshade
> To:
> Jude ; ‘Jacob
> Israel’ ; [email protected]
> ; [email protected] ; [email protected]
> ; [email protected] ;
> [email protected]
> ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ;
> [email protected] ; [email protected] ;
> John
> Hansen
> Cc:
> [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] > ; [email protected]
> ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected]
> ;
> [email protected] ; [email protected] ;
> [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; > [email protected] ;
> [email protected] ; [email protected]
> ; [email protected]
> ; [email protected] ;
> ‘Jude’
> Sent:
> Saturday, December 19, 2009 8:52
> AM
> Subject:
> Re: JAMES THE BROTHER OF
> JESUS
>
>
>
>
>
> Have men noticed how constantly the US Media
> (TV ads/Movies) constantly degrade men &
> upgrade women??!!
> Corporations are falling over themselves to produce > ads which make men
> look stoopid & women look in control &
> superior. Every ad has an
> insult to men added to it. Who is doing this??!!
> Men themselves. In
> movies women are shown macho like that silly
> “TOMB RAIDER” movie.
> Showing women doing macho stuff they could never in > real
> life.
>
> There is a new Budwieser ad which shows a woman stapling
> flowers to a man’s suit pocket & going to
> staple the man’s penis!!
> Women in movies constantly shown kicking men
> testicles as some kind of
> new sport.
>
> Men should boycott every product which involves
> showing of their degredation in
> ads………………….
>
>
>
>
> — On
> Sat, 12/19/09, John Hansen > wrote:
>
>
> From:
> John Hansen
> Subject:
> Re: JAMES THE BROTHER OF JESUS
> To: “Jude” , “‘Jacob
> Israel'” ,
> [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected],
> [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], > [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
> [email protected],
> “‘Jude'”
> Date:
> Saturday, December 19, 2009, 5:50 AM
>
>
>
> #yiv631217969 #yiv1503650444 UNKNOWN {
> FONT-FAMILY:Helvetica;panose-1:2 11 6 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
> #yiv631217969 #yiv1503650444 UNKNOWN {
> FONT-FAMILY:”Cambria Math”;panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
> #yiv631217969 #yiv1503650444 UNKNOWN {
> FONT-FAMILY:Calibri;panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
> #yiv631217969 #yiv1503650444 UNKNOWN {
> FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma;panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
> #yiv631217969 #yiv1503650444 UNKNOWN {
> FONT-FAMILY:”Comic Sans MS”;panose-1:3 15 7 2 3 3 2 2 2 4;} > #yiv631217969 #yiv1503650444 UNKNOWN {
> FONT-FAMILY:Consolas;panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
> #yiv631217969 #yiv1503650444 UNKNOWN {
> FONT-FAMILY:Constantia;panose-1:2 3 6 2 5 3 6 3 3 3;}
> #yiv631217969 #yiv1503650444 UNKNOWN {
> FONT-FAMILY:Garamond;panose-1:2 2 4 4 3 3 1 1 8 3;}
> #yiv631217969 #yiv1503650444 UNKNOWN {
> FONT-FAMILY:inherit;}
> #yiv631217969 #yiv1503650444 #yiv1385031339 #yiv1385031339 > P.MsoNormal {
> MARGIN:0in;FONT-FAMILY:”Times New Roman”,
> “serif”;FONT-SIZE:12pt;}
> #yiv631217969 #yiv1503650444 #yiv1385031339 LI.MsoNormal { > MARGIN:0in;FONT-FAMILY:”Times New Roman”,
> “serif”;FONT-SIZE:12pt;}
> #yiv631217969 #yiv1503650444 #yiv1385031339 DIV.MsoNormal { > MARGIN:0in;FONT-FAMILY:”Times New Roman”,
> “serif”;FONT-SIZE:12pt;}
> #yiv631217969 #yiv1503650444 #yiv1385031339 A:link {
> COLOR:blue;TEXT-DECORATION:underline;}
> #yiv631217969 #yiv1503650444 #yiv1385031339
> SPAN.MsoHyperlink {
> COLOR:blue;TEXT-DECORATION:underline;}
> #yiv631217969 #yiv1503650444 #yiv1385031339 A:visited {
> COLOR:purple;TEXT-DECORATION:underline;}
> #yiv631217969 #yiv1503650444 #yiv1385031339
> SPAN.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {
> COLOR:purple;TEXT-DECORATION:underline;}
> #yiv631217969 #yiv1503650444 #yiv1385031339 P {
> FONT-FAMILY:”Times New Roman”,
> “serif”;MARGIN-LEFT:0in;FONT-SIZE:12pt;MARGIN-RIGHT:0in;}
> #yiv631217969 #yiv1503650444 #yiv1385031339 PRE {
> MARGIN:0in 0in 0pt;FONT-FAMILY:”Courier
> New”;FONT-SIZE:10pt;}
> #yiv631217969 #yiv1503650444 #yiv1385031339 TT {
> FONT-FAMILY:”Courier New”;}
> #yiv631217969 #yiv1503650444 #yiv1385031339
> SPAN.HTMLPreformattedChar {
> FONT-FAMILY:Consolas;}
> #yiv631217969 #yiv1503650444 #yiv1385031339
> SPAN.EmailStyle21 {
> FONT-FAMILY:”Calibri”, “sans-serif”;COLOR:#1f497d;}
> #yiv631217969 #yiv1503650444 #yiv1385031339
> SPAN.EmailStyle23 {
> FONT-FAMILY:”Calibri”, “sans-serif”;COLOR:#1f497d;}
> #yiv631217969 #yiv1503650444 #yiv1385031339 ….MsoChpDefault > {
> FONT-SIZE:10pt;}
> #yiv631217969 #yiv1503650444 UNKNOWN {
> MARGIN:1in;}
> #yiv631217969 #yiv1503650444 #yiv1385031339 DIV.Section1 { >
> }
>
>
> Well you
> don’t know it wasn’t a man that
> did all those things – many men do.
>
> You must be a
> woman
> yourself.
>
> I’m not
> particularly high on women but
> there are exceptions.
>
> And you can stop
> using “you silly man”
> because if you are male – that would be
> YOU.
>
> John
> Hansen
>
>
>
> Original Message
> From:
>
> Jude
> To:
>
> ‘Jacob
> Israel’ ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected]
>
> ; [email protected] ;
> [email protected] ; [email protected] ;
> [email protected] ;
> [email protected]
> ; [email protected] ; [email protected]
> ; ‘John
> Hansen’
> Cc:
>
> [email protected] ; [email protected] ;
[email protected]
>
> ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected]
>
> ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ;
> [email protected] ; [email protected] ;
[email protected] ;
> [email protected] ;
> [email protected] ; [email protected] > ; [email protected]
>
> ; [email protected] ;
> ‘Jude’
> Sent:
>
> Saturday, December 19, 2009 5:17 AM
> Subject:
>
> RE: JAMES THE BROTHER OF JESUS
>
>
>
> And
> if there were not a glass ceiling in America
> women would do much
> better you sill, silly man. Who changed
> your diaper and who
> taught how to behave? Who fed you and
> wiped your dribbling
> chin as you grew up and washed your dirty
> clothes? It sure as
> hell wasn’t man it was a woman and you would > abuse her for being
> there for you. Do you behave like this to
> your mother and
> grandmother? Why God wont plain break all
> men’s legs I
> have no idea.
>
>
>
> From:
> Jacob
> Israel [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday,
> December 18, 2009 6:38 PM
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
> vivave[email protected]; [email protected]; ‘John Hansen’; > Jude
> Cc: ‘Jude’; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected];
>
> [email protected]
> Subject:
> Re: JAMES THE BROTHER OF
> JESUS
>
>
>
> << do you think men would do without any
> females? Think
> about it, this is not a contest this is life > you silly
> man..>>>
>
>
>
>
>
> Let me
> expand on John’s critical
> point.
>
>
>
> The US
> Census Survey in 2000 estimated that men earn
> 82% of household
> incomes, and women only 18%. This after
> DECADES of affirmative
> action, the “equal pay act” and all
> types of government pressure on
> corporations to “equalize” incomes
> (which forced ALL of our
> industries OFFSHORE, all the way from China to > Portugal where there
> are no such laws).
>
>
>
> What kind
> of lifestyle do you women who keep repeating
> this silly mantra
> “think” you would have without men
> around?
>
>
>
> Would you
> be eating snakes off dirt floors, be repeatedly > gang raped by
> Chinese soldiers, and dialing 911 would get you > ONE female cop who
> has to do her nails before she can arrange an
> ox cart to get
> there? Would the life style of niggers in
> Africa look
> UP to you?
>
>
>
> http://israeliteidentity.com/familyincomes.htm >
>
>
> John
> Knight
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Original Message
>
> From:
> Jude
>
>
> To:
> ‘John
>
> Hansen’ ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; > [email protected]
> ; [email protected] ;
> [email protected] ;
> [email protected] ; [email protected]
> ; [email protected]
>
> ; [email protected] ; [email protected]
>
>
> Cc:
> [email protected]
> ; [email protected]
>
> ; [email protected]
> ; [email protected] ; [email protected] > ; [email protected] ;
> [email protected] ;
> [email protected] ; [email protected] ;
> [email protected] ;
> [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] >
> ; [email protected] ;
> [email protected] ; ‘Jude’
>
>
> Sent:
> Friday, December 18, 2009 4:04
> PM
>
> Subject:
> RE:
> JAMES THE BROTHER OF JESUS
>
>
> How
> do you think men would do without any
> females? Think
> about it, this is not a contest this is life > you silly
> man.
>
>
>
> From:
> John
> Hansen [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday,
> December 18, 2009 5:37 PM
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]
> Cc:
> [email protected];
>
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected];
> [email protected]
> Subject:
> Re: JAMES THE BROTHER OF
> JESUS
>
>
> And
> of course – if not for men – there would be
> no women at all.
>
>
>
>
> Original Message
>
> From:
> [email protected]
>
>
> To:
> [email protected] ;
> [email protected]
> ; [email protected]
> ; [email protected]
> ; [email protected] ; [email protected] > ; [email protected]
>
> ; [email protected] ; [email protected]
>
>
> Cc:
> [email protected]
> ; [email protected]
>
> ; [email protected]
> ; [email protected]
> ; [email protected] ;
> [email protected]
> ; [email protected]
> ; [email protected] ;
> [email protected] ;
> [email protected] ; [email protected] ;
> [email protected] ; [email protected]
> ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected]
>
> ; [email protected] ;
> [email protected]
>
>
> Sent:
> Friday, December 18, 2009 3:21
> PM
>
> Subject:
> Re: JAMES THE BROTHER OF
> JESUS
>
>
>
>
> Take
> heart, if it were not for women there would > be no men at all.
> Not now,
>
> Not
> ever. If anyone cared why anyone gets
> annoyed we would all
> be in trouble.
>
> Be
> Well, Be Happy, May you all have a Happy
> and Long Life, and
> few problems.
>
>
>
> Merry
> Christmas, and a Happy New Year to you
> all.
>
> Ellia
>
>
>
>
>
> In
> a message dated 12/17/2009 5:15:50 P.M.
> Mountain Standard Time,
> [email protected]
> writes:
>
>
>
> I
> agree, there’s a lot of women out
> there who even walk like
> men, and it annoys me. There’s
> ardent feminists who
> annoy me too. And it also annoys me
> that men don’t open
> doors for women as they used to do when I > was a girl.
> The attitude is, “Well, if
> they want to act like one of
> the boys, then we’ll treat them like
> one of the boys.” I
> think women have short-changed
> themselves.
>
>
>
> On
> the other hand, I dislike women being
> discriminated against
> because of their gender, especially when > it comes to equal pay
> for equal work.
>
>
>
> But
> I have always said, there is no equality > amongst the sexes.
> We have different functions, and we
> were meant to
> COMPLEMENT each other, not feel superior > or inferior to the
> other.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From:
> Jimmy Jumshade > To:
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> Judy Hayner
> Cc:
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]
> Sent:
> Thu, December 17, 2009 3:23:22 PM
> Subject: Re: JAMES
> THE BROTHER OF JESUS
>
>
>
>
> Yup, women are no longer
> women. They are
> “Wanna-be-men” which they can never be.
> This one gender crap has destroyed > the West & soon
> the
>
> world……………………..
>
>
>
> —
> On Thu, 12/17/09, Judy Hayner
>
> wrote:
>
> From:
> Judy Hayner
> Subject:
> Re: JAMES THE BROTHER OF JESUS
> To: [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected]…net,
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected], [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected]
> Date: Thursday, December 17,
> 2009, 12:20 PM
>
>
>
> Thank
> you for that. It is a fine
> response to John
> Knightakajacobisrael, who in his
> rants states he
> believes women should not be
> allowed to
> speak
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From:
> “[email protected]”
>
> To:
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected]
> Cc:
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected]
> Sent: Thu, December 17,
> 2009 8:22:17 AM
> Subject: Re: JAMES THE BROTHER
> OF JESUS
>
> Catholics
> are more quiet about their varying > dogmas. I
> knew a priest back in the 60’s
> who gave out special
> dispensations to women parishioners > to use birth
> control.. He had no authority
> to do that,
> but…..
> shhhhh! Now we have the
> American nuns defying the pope on
> his questionnaire
> about their life and teachings and > they refuse to
> respond to all of the
> questions.
> hahahah. I love
> it. Women aren’t
> what women used to be.
> Even nuns.
>
>
>
>
> This
> magnificent
> new speech by Jimmy
> Carter
> on this topic makes that point very > well.
> Excerpts:
>
> It
> is ironic that women are now
> welcomed into all major
> professions and other positions of > authority, but are
> branded as inferior and deprived of > the equal right to
> serve God in positions of religious > leadership. The
> plight of abused women is made more > acceptable by the
> mandated subservience of women by
> religious
> leaders.
> The
> truth is that male religious
> leaders have had – and
> still have – an option to
> interpret holy teachings
> either to exalt or subjugate
> women.. They have, for their
> own selfish ends, overwhelmingly
> chosen the latter.
> Their continuing choice provides
> the foundation or
> justification for much of the
> pervasive persecution and
> abuse of women throughout the
> world. This is in clear
> violation not just of the Universal > Declaration of Human
> Rights but also the teachings of
> Jesus Christ, the
> Apostle Paul, Moses and the
> prophets, Muhammad, and
> founders of other great religions – > all of whom have
> called for proper and equitable
> treatment of all the
> children of God. It is time we had > the courage to
> challenge these views and set a new > course that demands
> equal rights for women and men,
> girls and boys.
>
> At
> their most repugnant, the belief
> that women are inferior
> human beings in the eyes of God
> gives excuses to the
> brutal husband who beats his wife, > the soldier who rapes
> a woman, the employer who has a
> lower pay scale for
> women employees, or parents who
> decide to abort a female
> embryo. It also costs many millions > of girls and women
> control over their own bodies and
> lives, and continues
> to deny them fair and equal access > to education, health
> care, employment, and influence
> within their own
> communities
>
>
>
>
> In
> a message dated 12/16/2009 7:06:38 > P.M. Eastern Standard
> Time, [email protected]
> writes:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Indeed,
> they are both Christians,
> but Catholics are more
> unified in their dogmas and > doctrines, while the
> Protestant sects vary
>
> considerably.
>
>
>
>
> Original
>
> Message
>
>
>
>
> From: Jimmy
> Jumshade
>
> Date: 12/16/2009 4:00:26
> PM
>
> To: [email protected];
>
> [email protected];
>
> [email protected];
>
> [email protected];
>
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> Viva
> Veridad
>
> Cc: [email protected]; >
> [email protected];
>
> [email protected];
>
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
>
> [email protected];
>
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
>
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
>
> [email protected];
>
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
>
> [email protected];
>
> [email protected]
>
> Subject: Re: JAMES THE BROTHER > OF
> JESUS
>
>
>
>
>
>
> No
> confusion…..both are
>
> Christians…………………………..
>
>
>
> —
> On Wed, 12/16/09, Viva
> Veridad
>
>
> wrote:
>
>
> From: Viva Veridad
>
>
> Subject: Re:
> JAMES THE BROTHER OF JESUS > To: “Jimmy
> Jumshade”
> ,
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected], >
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected],
> [email protected], > [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected]
> Date: Wednesday,
> December 16, 2009, 3:52
> PM
>
>
>
> Don’t
> confuse Catholics with
> Protestants.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From:
> Jimmy Jumshade
>
>
> To:
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected]; >
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected]
> Cc:
> [email protected];
> [email protected]; > [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected]
> Sent: Wed,
> December 16, 2009 6:18:22
> PM
> Subject:
> Re: JAMES THE BROTHER OF
> JESUS
>
>
>
>
>
> Missionaries always
> came with food in one hand > & Bible in the
> other. In other words
> extortion for
>
> food…………………..
>
>
> —
> On Wed, 12/16/09,
> [email protected]
>
>
> wrote:
>
>
> From:
> [email protected]
>
> Subject: Re: JAMES
> THE BROTHER OF JESUS
> To: [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected], >
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected]
> Cc:
> [email protected],
> [email protected], > [email protected],
> [email protected]…com, > [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected],
> [email protected], > [email protected]
> Date: Wednesday,
> December 16, 2009, 3:08
> PM
>
>
> Lol.
>
>
>
> They,
> bringing the truth, could
> not expect the pagans
> to just give up their pagan > ways
>
> overnight.
>
> And
> since they were bringing
> the truth, they just
> naturally assumed the
> pagans didn’t have any
> until they got there.
>
> And that’s how
> they showed the pagans
> it’s true you can be
> naive and condescending at > the same
> time.
>
> 🙂
>
>
>
>
>
> Original
> Message
> From: [email protected]
> Sent:
> Wed, Dec 16, 2009 2:15 pm
> Subject: Re: JAMES
> THE BROTHER OF
> JESUS
>
> When
> missionaries went forth,
> obeying Jesus’ words to
> preach to all, they came
> upon pagans, naturally
> enough. So what did
> you expect them to do?
>
>
>
>
> They,
> bringing the truth, could
> not expect the pagans
> to just give up their pagan > ways overnight.
> They had to allow the
> potential converts
> to slowly come to the
> knowledge of the truth and
> it was only good manners
> and consideration for
> them, and a bit of respect > thrown in, that the
> decision was made to allow > them to keep some of
> their practices,
> temporarily.
>
>
>
>
> Pagan
> feast days had hitherto
> been enjoyed by the
> pagans, so let them have
> their days, and if they
> coincided with important
> Christian feast days,
> then so much the better.
>
>
>
>
> it’s
> really quite simple.
>
>
>
>
> The
> missionaries were men of
> God. They were
> not military strategists.. >
>
> Original
> Message
> From: Therese Dietliin
>
>
> To:
> [email protected]; > [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected]; debunks >
>
> Cc:
> [email protected];
> [email protected]; > [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected];
> [email protected]; > [email protected]
> Sent: Wed, Dec 16, 2009
> 4:16 pm
> Subject: Re: JAMES THE BROTHER OF
> JESUS
> Why not? Christians –
> particularly Catholics hellbent on conversion –
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> incorporated pagan mythology and thus coopted pagan gods
> and goddesses just
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> about everywhere they went on the planet.
> Who’s to say they didn’t adopt and
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> adapt just to get the show
> started?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> — On Wed, 12/16/09, debunks
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > From: debunks
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Subject: Re: JAMES THE BROTHER OF JESUS
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > To: [email protected], [email protected],
> [email protected],
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [email protected], [email protected],
> [email protected]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Cc: [email protected],
> [email protected], [email protected],
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [email protected], [email protected],
> [email protected],
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [email protected], [email protected],
> [email protected],
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [email protected], [email protected],
> [email protected], [email protected],
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [email protected], [email protected],
> [email protected], [email protected],
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [email protected], [email protected],
> [email protected], [email protected],
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [email protected],
> [email protected]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>
>
>
>
> Date:
> Wednesday, December 16, 2009, 10:58
> AM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > #yiv640305111 v0003a* {
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > }
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > #yiv640305111 v0003a* {
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > }
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Not to
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > nitpick, but, mythology, as you say, occurs over
> the span of
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > hundreds – if not thousands, of years. That
> is one
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > thing. The testimony of the Gospels and the
> early
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > successors to the apostles are quite another.
> In that
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > case, the mythologic aspect would
> not apply,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> imo.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Looking for the perfect
> gift? Give the gift of
>
> Flickr!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yu
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Instant
> message from any web browser! Try the new > Yahoo!
> Canada Messenger for the
> Web
> BETA
>
>
>
>
>
>
> E-mail message
> checked by Spyware Doctor
> (7.0.0.513)
> Database version:
> 6.13950
> http://www.pctools.com/spyware-doctor-antivirus/
>
>
>
>
> E-mail message checked
> by Spyware Doctor
> (7.0.0.513)
> Database version:
> 6.13950
> http://www.pctools.com/spyware-doctor-antivirus/
>
>
>
>
> E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor
> (7.0.0.513)
> Database version: 6.13950
> http://www.pctools.com/spyware-doctor-antivirus/
>
>
>
>
> E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (7.0.0.513)
> Database version: 6.13950
> http://www.pctools.com/spyware-doctor-antivirus/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (7.0.0.513)
Database version: 6.13950
http://www.pctools.com/spyware-doctor-antivirus/

E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (7.0.0.513)
Database version: 6.13950
http://www.pctools.com/spyware-doctor-antivirus/

E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (7.0.0.513)
Database version: 6.13950
http://www.pctools.com/spyware-doctor-antivirus/

E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (7.0.0.513)
Database version: 6.13950
http://www.pctools.com/spyware-doctor-antivirus/